← Reddit

A beginner’s experience building with fully homomorphic encryption

Reddit · BestAd5572 · August 14, 2026
A developer with no coding background built VitalVault, a fully homomorphic encryption health application that encrypts health data on users' devices and performs wellness calculations on the encrypted data without exposing sensitive information. Using Claude Code and Niobium's open-source FHE tools, the developer documented the three-day development process to help other beginners understand FHE development and AI-assisted coding.

Detailed Analysis

A Reddit post from a self-described marketing intern at Niobium has drawn attention in the r/ClaudeAI community for documenting a genuinely unusual build: a fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) health application called VitalVault, created over three days by someone with zero prior coding experience, using Claude Code paired with Niobium's open-source FHE tooling. The app encrypts health markers like bloodwork on-device and computes wellness scores and estimated biological age while the data remains encrypted throughout — meaning the person or system evaluating the results never sees the underlying plaintext health information. The poster shared a detailed writeup and GitHub repository, explicitly noting the failures and dead ends alongside what worked, positioning the post as a practical resource for other beginners rather than a promotional pitch, despite acknowledging the obvious conflict of interest.

The technical significance here lies in the combination of two historically inaccessible domains: fully homomorphic encryption and software development itself. FHE, and specifically the CKKS scheme mentioned in the post, allows mathematical operations to be performed directly on encrypted data without ever decrypting it — a capability long considered the "holy grail" of cryptography because of its potential to enable computation on sensitive data (health records, financial information, biometric data) without exposing it to the party doing the computation. Historically, FHE has been notoriously difficult to implement correctly, requiring deep expertise in lattice-based cryptography, careful management of noise growth in ciphertexts, and scheme-specific constraints on what operations can even be expressed. That someone with no coding background could get a working CKKS-based scoring pipeline running in three days, with Claude Code handling much of the translation between intent and implementation, is a meaningful data point about how far AI coding assistants have compressed the learning curve for specialized, traditionally expert-gated technical domains.

This matters beyond the individual anecdote because it illustrates a broader shift in who can build with privacy-preserving cryptographic tools. FHE has existed academically for over a decade and has seen growing commercial interest from companies like Zama, Niobium, and others building developer-facing libraries, but adoption has been bottlenecked by the scarcity of engineers who understand both cryptography and application development well enough to bridge the two. If AI coding assistants can meaningfully lower that barrier — even partially, even with a domain expert's tooling doing heavy lifting — it expands the pool of people who can prototype privacy-preserving applications in health tech, finance, and other regulated industries where data sensitivity is a first-order constraint on what can be built at all.

The post also serves as a useful, unvarnished case study in AI-assisted coding practice more broadly: the author frames the value not in the final artifact but in the messy middle — determining which scoring logic is compatible with CKKS's computational constraints, working through build failures, calibrating how much context Claude needed to be useful, and learning underlying software concepts concurrently with applying them. This mirrors a recurring theme in the Claude Code ecosystem, where users increasingly report using the tool not just to generate code but as a mechanism for learning technical domains in real time, with the AI acting as both implementer and informal tutor. Whether this pattern scales safely — particularly in domains like cryptography and health data, where subtle implementation errors can silently undermine security guarantees — remains an open question, and one that likely warrants more scrutiny than a single enthusiastic beginner's writeup can settle. But as a signal of where AI-assisted development is heading, the anecdote fits a broader trend of increasingly specialized, expert-tooled domains becoming accessible to non-specialists through the combination of capable coding models and purpose-built open-source libraries.

Read original article →