Detailed Analysis
A user on the r/Anthropic subreddit has reported an anomalous behavior in Claude's interface where newly created Claude instances display internal reasoning steps — colloquially referred to as "thinking" — despite the feature being explicitly toggled off and the effort level set to low. The issue appears to be isolated to sessions initiated after a specific point in time, as older, previously created chats do not exhibit the same behavior. The user has already escalated the matter to Anthropic directly, suggesting the bug is considered significant enough to warrant official attention. The selective nature of the malfunction — affecting only new instances, not legacy ones — points to a likely backend deployment change or configuration update that inadvertently altered default behavior for newly spawned sessions.
The practical consequence that makes this more than a cosmetic annoyance is its impact on token and usage consumption. Claude's extended thinking feature, which allows the model to work through multi-step reasoning before delivering a final response, consumes additional compute resources and counts against usage limits. For subscription users on tiered plans, unexpected activation of extended thinking can deplete allowances significantly faster than anticipated. This transforms what might otherwise be a minor UI quirk into a financially and functionally meaningful issue, particularly for heavier users or those on lower-tier plans with tighter usage caps.
The incident highlights a broader challenge in deploying AI systems with increasingly granular user-facing controls: the complexity of honoring user preferences across distributed infrastructure. As Anthropic has progressively layered capabilities like extended thinking — introduced as a distinct, toggleable feature in Claude models such as Claude 3.7 Sonnet — the surface area for configuration drift or deployment mismatches expands. A backend rollout, A/B test, or parameter override applied at the session initialization level could easily bypass client-side toggle states, especially if the feature flag logic is not consistently propagated across all session types.
More broadly, the report reflects a tension inherent in the current generation of AI assistants: the features designed to make models more capable, such as chain-of-thought reasoning and extended thinking, simultaneously introduce new layers of opacity and resource unpredictability for end users. When thinking is working as intended and toggled on deliberately, it can meaningfully improve output quality for complex tasks. But when it activates without user consent, it undermines trust in the control mechanisms Anthropic has built and raises questions about the reliability of user-facing configuration settings. The fact that the user flagged this immediately and reported it suggests growing user awareness of how these features affect both experience and resource consumption — a level of engagement that reflects the maturing sophistication of Claude's user base.
Read original article →